Search for: "US v. Luna"
Results 81 - 100
of 164
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2024, 3:30 am
See, e.g., Revak v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 10:24 am
The second case, Luna v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 2:33 pm
For more info about us, click here. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 5:30 am
Utah v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 4:56 am
Luna, 577 U. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 4:11 pm
Stern, a California lawyer; no dice, said the district court in Stern v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, October 14, 2008 US v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 11:56 am
Via Reason.com, here's the complaint in Eckert v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:52 pm
Others expressed concern about how the data could be used against them if their employees are not diverse enough for the lawmakers. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 2:08 pm
Luna, 577 U.S. ___, ___–___ (2015) ( per curiam) (slip op., at 4–5) (internal quotation marks omitted); Taylor v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 3:47 am
” At the NCSL Blog, Lisa Soronen analyzes the recent summary decision in Mullenix v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 1:25 pm
Justice Scalia's comments came in the 2006 Supreme Court ruling Kansas v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:05 pm
Luna 14-1143Issue: (1) Whether, when viewing the facts from the perspective of an officer who fired his service rifle at a vehicle involved in a high-speed chase, the officer acted reasonably under the Fourth Amendment when an officer in his situation would believe that the suspect posed a risk of serious harm to other officers or members of the public; and (2) whether the law clearly established that this use of potentially deadly force was unlawful when existing precedent did… [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am
Luna, 14-1143. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:19 am
At the arguments in the case, Friedrichs v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 3:00 pm
Adame v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:51 am
In Maples v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:11 pm
Jacobs v. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 6:18 pm
Forest Guardians v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 10:23 am
The recent overdose death of actor Philip Seymour Hoffman brings into sharper relief the issue decided by the Supreme Court last week in Burrage v. [read post]
