Search for: "US v. Mann" Results 1 - 20 of 897
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2013, 11:21 am by David Friedman
I offer, as a contrast to Hansen, another prominent figure on the same side of the dispute, Michael Mann, most famous for his role in the hockey stick controversy, the argument over whether features of a graph of global temperature in an article he co-authored were real or were artifacts of an error in the statistical procedure he used to produce it. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 4:00 pm
  To download a copy of the Court of Appeals' decision, please use this link: Mann v. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 3:16 am
Mr Justice Mann was in action last Friday, giving judgment in Score Draw Ltd v Finch [2007] EWHC 462 (Ch), an appeal to the Chancery Division (England and Wales) from a decision of the UK Trade Mark Registry.Score Draw made and sold replica nostalgic football shirts. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 12:56 am
' was the question before the court in Shanks v Unilever plc and others [2009] EWHC 3164 (Ch), a decision of Mr Justice Mann in the Patents Court, England and Wales, yesterday. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 1:59 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
If Mann sues us, the materials we will need to mount a full defense will be extremely wide-ranging. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 5:41 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Dr Michael Mann’s lawyer, John Williams, filed a fraudulent complaint falsely representing his client as a Nobel Laureate, and accusing us of the hitherto unknown crime of defaming a Nobel Laureate. 2. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 4:37 pm by Venkat
Sawabeh * Employee's Claims Against Employer for Unauthorized Use of Social Media Accounts Move Forward--Maremont v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 5:50 pm by Kurt Schulzke
In fact, seems to me that the central question before the Attorney General is really the extent to which the grant funds were used for scientific inquiry versus political advocacy on behalf of the climate change lobby. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:55 am by admin
On the first part of her proferred opinion, Judge Irving expressed his skepticism that Oreskes’ opinion would be helpful to the jury; Oreskes’ testimony might give the jury a framework that could be used to assess whether Mann’s work was fraudulent or not. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 2:43 am
Jane Lambert Patents Court (Sir Alistair Norris) Mitsubishi Electric Corporation and another v Archos SA and others [2020] EWHC 2641 (Pat) (9 Oct 2020)In these proceedings, Sir Alistair Norris was asked to vary a confidentiality order that had been made by Mr Justice Mann at a case management conference on 22 July 2020. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 12:07 pm
The question now is whether the additional conduct alleged in plaintiffs’ opposition -- Mann’s failure to use a turn signal, making of a sharp left turn from the middle of the snow run, failure to warn skiers on mambo of his presence, and failure to warn skiers of the existence of Old Boneyard Road -- elevated Mann’s conduct to gross negligence. [read post]