Search for: "US v. Mark Bristow"
Results 1 - 20
of 59
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2018, 3:04 am
Rightsholders will be able to bring a claim of infringement in relation to preparatory acts in the use of packaging and labels.Registration of Non-Traditional Trade MarksJeremy Blum from Bristows nicely complemented Marks talk, by going into more detail on the removal of “graphical representation” requirement. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
From Bristow v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 1:28 am
Saaira Gill (Bristows) takes up the tale:"CEL’s registration, upon which it based its infringement claim (and succeeded subject to the current issue), is a series registration for the two device marks shown below:-(The first mark claims the colours red, black and white.) [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm
Another topic that demands our better appreciation is that of using other businesses' brands and trade marks in comparative and referential advertising. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 4:59 am
Chaired by Mark Brown (Bristows), the panel featured Aimee Nisbet (Hearst Corporation), Eleonora Rosati (University of Southampton and IPKat), Nicholas Saunders (Brick Court Chambers) and Theo Savvides (Bristows). [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 1:00 am
The scope of protection is even less precise for trade marks when use is taken into account and, of course, the registers do not contain unregistered rights. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:49 am
The irrepressible Katonomist Nicola roars into action with a fun piece about the apparent attempt of the US government to control biker gangs through the use of ... trade mark law. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 11:39 am
A couple of weeks ago, His Honour Judge Hacon (sitting in theHigh Court) handed down his decision in Glaxo v Sandoz [2016] EWHC 1537 in which he was asked by Sandoz to determine, on a summary judgment application, whether Glaxo's EU Trade Mark No 3890126 was invalid. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 2:37 pm
The CJEU’s ruling in DHL v ChronopostThe CJEU made it manifestly clear in its 2011 ruling in Case C-235/09 DHL v Chronopost [see previous Katpost here] that a Europe-wide injunction should only be granted in order to ensure that the proprietor can protect his trade mark, prohibiting only uses which affect or are liable to affect the functions of the trade mark. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 2:38 am
Batman v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 9:32 am
The jiplp weblog features two recent current intelligence notes: Esther Schnepper reviews the Community trade mark spat between Volvo and Solvo over their similar but non-confusing marks, while AmeriKat Annsley teams up with colleague Paul Keller to write about patent attorney fees in the US in the wake of the Kilopass ruling. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 12:18 am
This comment was brought to the Kat's attention by a jubilant Paul Walsh (Bristows), who acted for the happy defendants. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:20 pm
Luke Maunder (Bristows LLP) reports on the decision which will be interest to anyone who loves color combination trade marks or trying to figure out how to precisely and clearly ring fence the scope of trade mark protection Conference Report: Should you arbitrate FRAND rates? [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 11:30 pm
Jeremy Blum (Bristows) and Andrew Butcher (Bristows) explain: "Given that we can count on one hand the number of judgments on the topic of trade mark infringement in the context of key word advertising (by our count they are L’Oréal, M&S, Lush, Mr Spicy) we were unsurprisingly eager to receive last Friday’s decision of Mr Justice Carr in Victoria Plum Limited v Victorian Plumbing Ltd [2016] EWHC 2911 (Ch). [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 10:43 am
For further details, just click here.On Monday this Kat made mention of a recent OHIM Board of Appeal ruling regarding non-use of the WEBSHIPPING Community trade mark and whether the fact that an alleged infringer was carrying on using your mark even after a court had ordered it to stop was a proper reason for non-use. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
Never too late 30 [week ending Sunday 25 January] -- Julia Reda’s EU copyright revolution | GC on trade-marketing bottle shapes in (T-69/14 and T-70/14) | IPKat and BLACA’s event on Sensory copyright | IP Cross-Border Enforcement | US Supreme Court in Teva v Sandoz | On-line copyright infringement in Spain | GC on the ‘Pianissimo’ trade mark for vacuum cleaners in Case… [read post]
16 May 2017, 2:55 am
Mikolaj discusses how it can help us understand the role of trade marks that emerged from a given moment of history. [read post]
8 May 2017, 10:17 am
GuestKats and InternKat I BREAKING: Birss J hands down first FRAND decision in Unwired Planet v Huawei I Retromark: a year in trade marks I Can a public domain artwork be registered as a trade mark or would that be contrary to public policy and morality? [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
It is about a business that got a bunch of trade marks covering the somewhat unregistrable word "supreme", and then decided to bring proceedings against a defendant who wasn't using the word as a trade mark and whose use of it went back 20 years, recounts Jeremy.* The EPO: privileged and immune says the PresidentMerpel re-sinks her paws in the hot story of the decision that Hague Court of Appeal issued in the sadly famous proceedings in SUEPO… [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:00 am
Rachel Mumby and Claire Phipps-Jones (Bristows LLP) have come to the rescue and provide a summary of this year's proceedings. [read post]
