Search for: "US v. Mark Grape" Results 1 - 20 of 62
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2012, 9:35 am by Darren
Alasdair Sholto-Douglas SC has pulled off quite a feat by convincing Davis J, sitting in the Western Cape High Court, that near identical trade marks used in relation to wine and grapes are not confusingly similar. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:54 am by Jocelyn Bosse
 This time, the competing views were laid bare in the recent judgment of the Singapore Court of Appeal in Consorzio di Tutela della Denominazione di Origine Controllata Prosecco v Australian Grape and Wine Incorporated [2023] SGCA 37. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 9:28 am
The court held that single instance of display of a trademark on race car and jumpsuit did not establish intent to use the mark for the registered product. [read post]
20 May 2010, 6:37 pm by Barry Eagar
 Houlihan licensed the trade mark to Grape Links Inc that traded as Barefoot Cellars.Grape Links Inc was sold to Gallo by an agreement dated 10 November 2004. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 11:19 am by Alex Woolgar
The requirements include that at least 85% of the contents of a bottle must be derived from a single grape variety (Glera); the grapes must be grown within nine specified provinces in Northeast Italy; the natural alcohol level must be at least 9%; and particular methods of production must be used.In the UK IPO, the Consorzio successfully convinced the Hearing Officer that the registration of the Nosecco trade mark would cut across the PDO (and therefore would be contrary… [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 9:27 pm by Afro Leo
This was highlighted by the US reaction to the first decision of the High Court (then Supreme Court) when Mcdonalds lost a trade mark battle against a local. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 1:06 am by Afro Leo
Although it does not give you a practice on the similarity of wine & grapes, it does for just about every other good and service. [read post]