Search for: "US v. Mark Jacobs" Results 1 - 20 of 475
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2024, 8:08 am by Alessandro Cerri
 In the Court's view, the best description of the correct approach for a judge to assess evidence in trade mark infringement and passing off cases is found in Mr Justice Jacob's judgment in Neutrogena v Golden [1996] RPC 473: "The judge must consider the evidence adduced and use his own common sense and his own opinion as to the likelihood of deception. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 5:31 pm by INFORRM
Marking a decade of championing free speech, we invite you to celebrate the initiative with us. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 I’ve marked in boldface, and labeled as [1] and [2], the two separate clauses of Section 3 that identify particular officers and other government officials. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Mark Lemley: a surprising number of your examples involved women. [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 4:10 am by INFORRM
On November 30, 2023, the Media Law Resource Center (MLRC) filed an amicus curiae brief with the US Supreme Court in Moody v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 4:39 am by Irina Tarsis, Esq.
“L’Echelle de Jacob or Le Paysan et l’Echeele,” The Peasant and the Ladder or Jacob’s Ladder, by Marc Chagall, painting disputed in Menzel v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Nancy Marks, who was a close aide to Santos during his two congressional bids, is a longtime political operative and bookkeeper for multiple candidates. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
A US Federal Court in Manhattan dismissed the claim following trial in April 2023. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
This duo gives us a solid overview of the MQD’s triggers that is increasingly being picked up by advocates and academics. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 5:04 am by INFORRM
However, the Supreme Court rejected this conclusion and affirmed that parody cannot be a shield against trademark claims when the mark is used as source-identifying —i.e. when the accused infringer used a trademark to designate the source of its own goods. [read post]