Search for: "US v. Mark Jacobs"
Results 41 - 60
of 475
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
The removal of the own name defence and fundamental rights – Sky v SkyKickSky v SkyKick [2017] EWHC 1769 (Ch) (July 2017)Most trade mark lawyers know Sky’s reputation for pursuing action against anyone using the word SKY in their name, even SKYPE. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:19 am
(v) Neither customers nor ultimate consumers are deceived as a result of the use of the lists. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 4:39 am
"The Board distinguished Jacobs v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 7:49 pm
Co-authored by Jacob Oslick and Noah Finkel Mark Twain famously said that “there are lies, damn lies, and statistics. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 1:19 am
” Jacobs v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:30 am
You can book here.For the more trade mark inclined, comes the enticingly entitled “Trade Marks: The Future of the Advertising Function”. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 5:59 am
Cir. 2003) (quoting Jacobs v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 10:46 am
This Kat, however, thinks that AG Wathelet is right and that, when he says"[The applicant] must prove that only the trade mark in respect of which registration is sought, as opposed to any other trade marks which may also be present, indicates, without any possibility of confusion, the exclusive origin of the goods or services at issue",he is vindicating the point made by Sir Robin Jacob about "limping marks" back in the 1990s in Philips… [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 11:20 pm
In re Wente Bros. dba Tamas Estates, Serial No. 77314718 (August 6, 2009) [not precedential].The CCPA's decision in Jacobs v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 2:55 am
" In sum, the marks are similar in sight, sound, connotation and commercial impression.The Goods and Services: "[T]he mere fact that a restaurant may offer certain food items or beverages does not by itself mean that the food or drink is related to the restaurant services; rather, in order '[t]o establish likelihood of confusion a party must show something more than that similar or even identical marks are used for food products and for restaurant… [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 10:36 am
The court of appeals affirmed but modified the injunction to restrain only CBG’s use of its composite mark (both parties apparently used bird logos). [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:37 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 3:02 pm
Co. v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 3:32 am
| Tourism and Culture in the Age of Innovation | Lord Neuberger's most difficult case | US Senate passes Trade Secrets Act Never too late 90 [week ending on Sunday 3 April] – Book review: "IP and Other Things" by Sir Robin Jacob| Book review: "Trade Marks Law" by Glen Gibbons| IPKat Post #10,00 | Taser International Inc. v SC Gate 4 Business SRL and Others |Two Book Reviews: European Law… [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 3:20 pm
” Jacob Maxwell, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 2:45 am
Cadbury UK Ltd v The Comptroller General of Patents Designs And Trade Marks [2018] EWCA Civ 2715 (05 December 2018) is an unedifying case. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 3:04 am
Jacobs v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 12:46 am
| Tourism and Culture in the Age of Innovation | Lord Neuberger's most difficult case | US Senate passes Trade Secrets Act Never too late 90 [week ending on Sunday 3 April] – Book review: "IP and Other Things" by Sir Robin Jacob| Book review: "Trade Marks Law" by Glen Gibbons| IPKat Post #10,00 | Taser International Inc. v SC Gate 4 Business SRL and Others |Two Book Reviews: European Law… [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 10:03 am
Read the case here: THI of Texas v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
As Darren explains, the Supreme Court of the USA has just weighed in on the same matter in the case of Teva v Sandoz.* Exodus 2.0: pirate sites and the seven seasJeremy gives the floor to Míchel Olmedo Cuevas, who seizes the moment when a brand-new Hollywood colossal is being launched to explain the brand-new enforcement measures that the recent Spanish reform provides to battle online copyright infringement.* Softly, softly: General Court no-hopes Pianissimo… [read post]
