Search for: "US v. Mark James" Results 61 - 80 of 1,743
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2016, 7:01 pm
 James highlighted the case of DuPont v Kolon - which concerned the Kevlar trade secrets (read about the case here in the testimony from Karen Cochran) - and recent cases concerning Chinese espionage (US v Xu and Zi, US v Xi and US v Chen) as examples of criminal trade secrets prosecution. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:10 am
James reminded us of Toth v Emirates [2012] EWHC 517 (Ch), which limited the scope for taking Nominet decisions before the courts for a judicial review [on which see brief Katnote here].Turning to passing off, the Advocaat, Jif Lemon, Henry vacuum cleaner, Moroccanoil, Swiss chocolate, the FAGE/Chobani Greek yoghurt and Vodkat decisions were also subjected to James' analysis. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 2:12 pm by Eric Goldman
In fact, the allegations either state directly, or create a strong inference, that the purpose of Defendants’ use of the marks is to disparage Plaintiff and endorse Regal. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 3:10 am
This article investigates the quirks of the Lanham Act’s Section 2(a), which provides a right-of-publicity-style ground of refusal of registration to celebrities, universities with nicknames, and international companies seeking protection of their well-known marks in the United States (where those companies are not using such marks)—and without a showing of trademark rights, use in commerce, or likelihood of confusion. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 12:24 pm by Dennis Crouch
By Dennis Crouch [Update –  Read the Complaint Here] MadStad & Mark Stadnyk v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 7:44 am by Cody M. Poplin
For the first time since February, proceedings in military commissions case United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 8:35 am by James Kwong
Trade Marks GuestKat Nedim Malovic reported and commented on a couple of EU trade mark decisions:- ·       The first is the decision(Case T-251/21 Tigercat Inc v EUIPO) of the EU General Court on the appeal in relation to the opposition against “Tigercat” filed by Caterpillar Inc. based on its earlier figurative EU trade mark for “Cat” and device (see here). [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 9:23 am
By James KachmarOn December 28, 2007, the Ninth Circuit issued its opinion in the case titled Applied Information Sciences Corp. v. eBay, Inc., in which it clarified the plaintiff’s burden in a federally registered trademark infringement action. [read post]