Search for: "US v. Mark Stephens"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2010, 4:17 pm
Weber-Stephen Products Co.; Simonian v. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 1:51 am
Stephens, is authored by a new and somewhat controversial Trump appointee, John K. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 11:49 am
Justice Stephen Breyer dissented. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 11:37 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 12:20 pm
Mark R. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
Also in Kenya, the High Court, in the case of Caterpillar (Quingzhou) Limited v Machinery World Limited, upheld the decision of the Assistant Registrar of Trademarks which had held that the parties’ marks were not confusingly similar, especially considering the discerning nature of the relevant consumers and the well-known status of the Appellant’s mark. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 12:51 pm
Professor Stephen Bainbridge offers more detailed analysis. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 8:54 am
The advertiser didn’t use Stephen’s full name, and other Dr. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 7:43 pm
Moreover, he had been using his mark well before Red Bull had even filed its mark. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 12:20 pm
What would Svatý Václav say to us, 1,080 years after his famous walk? [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 3:03 am
Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v Television Food Network GP [2010] FCAFC 58 (Keane CJ, Stone and Jagot JJ) [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 2:33 am
Stephen M Meli, D2010-0760 (WIPO July 27, 2010) were denied. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:21 pm
MoveOn.org also argued that its use of a modified version of the service mark was strongly protected because it was an expressive use for non-commercial purposes and that the service mark belonged to the State of Louisiana, which was the target of the parodic use. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 7:09 am
The IPKat was indebted to Stephen Vousden for helpfully providing a note on the Advocate General's Opinion, which you can read here. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:21 pm
MoveOn.org also argued that its use of a modified version of the service mark was strongly protected because it was an expressive use for non-commercial purposes and that the service mark belonged to the State of Louisiana, which was the target of the parodic use. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:21 pm
MoveOn.org also argued that its use of a modified version of the service mark was strongly protected because it was an expressive use for non-commercial purposes and that the service mark belonged to the State of Louisiana, which was the target of the parodic use. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:04 pm
Of the 1,400 people who have voted thus far in our reader poll, only 34 percent would vote “guilty” if they were jurors in the case of State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 8:11 pm
Mattel Inc. v. [read post]
