Search for: "US v. McClendon"
Results 1 - 20
of 42
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2013, 12:26 pm
But I still liked it.This troubled week could definitely use a bit of humor. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 12:26 am
McClendon. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 8:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
McClendon v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 12:08 pm
’ The court reasoned that, although McClendon's generalized representations regarding criminal suspects' use of electronic devices might be insufficient to substantiate probable cause, the circumstance that defendant had, in fact, used his cell phone to access and store a recording of the altercation was decisive: `Here, the police had concrete proof that the defendant had a cell phone and that he had used it in the manner that the trooper's… [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 3:27 am
Pierre in turn relied on New York v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
McClendon v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
Eisbrenner 23,083 214,100 -- 11,487 248,670 V. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 9:38 am
From McClendon v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 12:19 pm
McClendon is used to getting his way. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 1:35 pm
The firm's first major case was Gallant v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:09 am
McClendon, 350 N.C. 630 (1999). [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
McClendon also has use of the fractionally owned company aircraft, valued at $445,984 during fiscal 2009. [read post]
12 May 2007, 6:11 am
State v. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 2:13 pm
LEXIS 41703 (SD GA, March 25, 2013), a Georgia federal district court agreed with a magistrate's recommendations and dismissed an inmate's complaint that his free exercise rights were violated when non-vegan trays were used to serve vegan meals.In Handy v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 8:00 am
McClendon’s personal use of the company aircraft and $12.1 million for a collection of historical maps of the American Southwest. [read post]
1 May 2009, 5:00 am
Apparently personal use of Chesapeake's engineering staff. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 10:06 am
City of Seattle v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm
That decision catalyzed sex-stereotyping theory as an independent cause of action under Title VII, and it was quickly put to use by effeminate gay men and masculine lesbians who claimed that the hostility and adversity they experienced was sex, rather than sexual orientation, discrimination.Second, in Oncale v. [read post]
