Search for: "US v. Michael Butts" Results 61 - 80 of 87
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2010, 10:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
This is bound up with rules v. standards. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
  Often this was used as a device to avoid committed responses on the question of truth and other defences. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
The IAPP reports that Cambridge Analytica alleged used Facebook users’ fashion preferences to target them with ads. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
” The Michael Geist blog has a post “Does Canadian Privacy Law Matter if it Can’t be Enforced? [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
Nomm pleaded guilty in US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia to conspiracy to commit felony copyright infringement. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 2:50 pm by Gideon
  Despite the inability to offer straight advice at almost any other juncture, on their they would universally agree:  Don’t piss off the government to save someone else’s butt. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
That decision followed a complaint by Mr Michael Bateman, Director, Human Resources of the ACT Department of Education and Training (the Department) concerning a letter the solicitor had written to the Chief Executive of the Department on 24 October 2006.3. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 3:32 pm by Patricia Hughes
(In an earlier blog, I suggest that Michael Wernick had been sent to diminish the impact of Wilson-Raybould’s testimony.) [read post]