Search for: "US v. Michael Harris" Results 61 - 80 of 691
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Noting that legislation, regulation, international accords, business trends, and physical impacts of climate change could all affect a registrant’s operations or results, the release “remind[ed] companies of their obligations under existing federal securities laws” “to consider climate change and its consequences as they prepare documents to be filed with us and provided to investors. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 2:53 am by Michael Ehline
If the leaker of the draft opinion, skewering former Justice Harry Blackmun, and overturning Roe v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am by Roger Parloff
Heytens, writing for the court, summarized both the issue presented and the panel’s decision in terse terms: The issue currently before us is whether that . . . 1872 legislation also prospectively lifted the constitutional disqualification for all future rebels or insurrectionists, no matter their conduct. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:30 am by Karen Tani
Alyass, Harvard University, “The People’s War on Drugs: Community Activism, the Carceral State, and the Crack Crisis in 1980s Detroit”Michael Z. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:38 pm by Katherine Pompilio
  Kurup and Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s ruling in Patel v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Wade, Justice Harry Blackmun began receiving death threats. [read post]
15 May 2022, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
The Michael Geist blog covers the latest parliamentary debate over the Online Streaming Act (B [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:03 pm by Katelynn Catalano
Such requests arose following the leak of a Supreme Court draft opinion indicating that the Court may strike down Roe v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
By contrast, if police took a statement in violation of Miranda, the statement would be inadmissible in the government’s affirmative case but admissible on cross-examination of the defendant, under Harris v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 11:47 pm by Frank Cranmer
The effect of the only leading case in that area – Harries v Church Commissioners for England [1992] 1 WLR 1241, aka the Bishop of Oxford case, which concerned the Church of England’s investment policy in relation to South Africa – was unclear [1]: there is a helpful note on Harries here. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
The proceedings should have been brought in a Californian court in accordance with the defendant’s terms of use. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 9:44 am by Katherine Pompilio
Benjamin Wittes analyzed Judge David Carter’s March 28 opinion on Donald Trump and John Eastman in Eastman v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 11:10 am by Katherine Pompilio
Reynolds traced the influence of the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Even as a judge on the Eighth Circuit, Harry Blackmun was substantially more liberal than President Nixon realized, but it was not until after he wrote the majority opinion in Roe v. [read post]