Search for: "US v. Michael Marshall" Results 1 - 20 of 481
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2010, 12:17 pm by propertyprof
Michael writes on land use and takings issues, and shares my fascination with Lingle v. [read post]
30 Dec 2023, 11:59 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
PDF Here is the abstract: In June of 2022, the US Supreme Court held in Oklahoma v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 3:31 am by Daniel Hemel
But as Michael Huston, an assistant to the solicitor general, acknowledged, that approach still would leave lower courts with “difficult questions. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 11:36 am
Nor, writes Smith, is this the first defense verdict in Marshall this year - in April, in Sofpool v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:29 am by SHG
Wake Forest University Law School Dean Jane Aiken sent an email to the entire law school “community”: Dear Wake Forest Law Community, As some of you know, a number of students reached out yesterday to the Dean’s Office about Professor Michael Curtis’ use of the “n-word” when teaching Brandenburg v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 4:04 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Michael Willrich’s Pox is a history of the fight against smallpox near the end of the 19th century in the United States. [read post]
The US Supreme Court Thursday announced that investigators have been unable to identify the individual or individuals who leaked a draft of the court’s opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:11 pm by Jason Mazzone
The article uses the twentieth anniversary of United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 8:01 am by Michael Seidman
At the dawn of the American constitutional tradition, John Marshall wrote in Marbury v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 5:48 am by John R. Byrne
Byrne"[I]nvestigators have been unable to determine at this time, using a preponderance of the evidence standard, the identity of the person(s) who disclosed the draft majority opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]