Search for: "US v. Michael Melton" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
They almost certainly did not anticipate the sorts of questions occasioned by the ERA because they did not understand that the Article V mechanism would prove extremely difficult to use. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 6:57 am by Mikhaila Fogel
Eliot Kim summarized the Supreme Court’s ruling in Jam v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
”   Both clauses use a “catch-all” term, but they differ slightly from one another in terms of their prepositions—a difference to which Trump would attach great significance. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Stephen Griffin
  This raises the potential of endlessly recycling disputes such as the constitutionality of a national bank.Historian Michael Vorenberg argues that prior to the Civil War, Americans did not regard Article V as offering a reasonable way to handle their urgent constitutional disputes. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:00 am
Forest Laboratories, Inc. turns law of declaratory judgment on its head: (Patent Docs), (Patent Baristas), Mircera (Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta) – Roche appeals preliminary injunction barring US sales of Mircera in patent infringement battle with Amgen: (Philip Brooks), (IP Law360), Norvasc (Amlodipine) – Ranbaxy becomes first foreign generic company to develop a generic product independently outside Japan and receive authorization from MHLW-Japan:… [read post]