Search for: "US v. Michael Queen"
Results 41 - 60
of 247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2019, 9:17 pm
The court next determined City’s adult-use regulations were content-neutral. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:26 am
Michael Geist has a post on how Canada’s political parties have been looking to implement wireless taxes. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Bush v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
Notes that the Public Law Project will not be making oral submissions, but says these are important submissions. 1200: Michael Fordham QC says the closest case we have is Bobb & Anor v Manning (Trinidad & Tobago) [2006] UKPC 22 (25 April 2006). 11:55: Michael Fordham QC submits it is accepted prerogative power has to be exercised in the public interest. 11:48: Michael Fordham QC queries whether there is some magic for prerogative… [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:29 pm
The Administrative Court will give judgment in the facial recognition case of The Queen (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police on 4 September 2019. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm
O'Connor's Pub)FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 20198:30 AM – 10:00 AMPetitioning the President: James Madison, The Haitian Revolution, and a Resurgence of the International Slave Trade (Arlington Room)Chairs: Malick Ghachem, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (mghachem@mit.edu), Rebecca J Scott, University of Michigan (rjscott@umich.edu) and Darrell Meadows, Nation Historical Publications & Records… [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 1:57 pm
German princes wrote to King George V, offering to substitute themselves for the kaiser. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm
Canada The Michael Geist – Internet [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm
The Daily Telegraph has an interview with the defendant who argues that the courts are being used to silence and control women. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
The Queen, [1985] 2 SCR 178 the Supreme Court recognized that all that is necessary to make a criminal offence subject to the jurisdiction of our courts is that a significant portion of the activities constituting that offence took place in Canada. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm
New Zealand Former MP and radio host Michael Laws is taking the Otago student magazine Critic to court over allegations he was defamed. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Hunt, Let Us Pray: The Case for Legislator-Led Prayer. 54 Tulsa Law Review 49-79 (2018). [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 10:09 am
If her FTC v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court case Weyerhaeuser v. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm
Surveillance The Siasat Daily has covered the issue of phone hacking and how uses can build an awareness of surveillance. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Capulong, Michael J. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm
Note that the unique case cite contains an error as this is decision in the Queen’s Bench Division, not the Administrative Court. [read post]
