Search for: "US v. Monroe Smith"
Results 1 - 20
of 69
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2023, 4:05 pm
Cynthia Godsoe (Brooklyn Law School), Abbe Smith (Georgetown University Law Center), & Ellen Yaroshefsky (Hofstra University - Maurice A. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 6:03 am
The developers lose the case, not because the Village did not demonstrate anti-Jewish animus, but on more mundane procedural grounds.The case is BMG Monroe LLC v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 1:20 pm
It is well settled that a defendant's statutory right to testify before the grand jury " must be scrupulously protected' " (People v Smith, 87 NY2d 715, 721, quoting People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326, 332). [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 7:12 am
This right "'must be scrupulously protected'"(People v Smith , 87 NY2d 715, 721 [1996], quoting People v Corrigan , 80 NY2d 326, 332 [1992]). [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 7:18 am
Another guy, Smith, uses his land for logging, selling topsoil and raises cows, chickens and other animals. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 9:51 pm
Beard v Town of Monroe, 2015 WL 8023632 (D. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:32 pm
Smith’s case. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:32 pm
Alaska, 415 US 308. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 9:14 pm
Beard v Town of Monroe, 2016 WL 7177758 (2nd Cir. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 6:28 am
Available: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2017178 Freedman, Monroe and Abbe Smith (2010) Lawyers’ Ethics. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 7:47 pm
by Jill PapernoSpecial Assistant Monroe County Public Defender 1. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 7:45 am
In Lawson v. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 1:34 pm
(E.g., People v Smith, 67 AD3d 1392, 1392 [4th Dept 2009] ("Where the officer's belief is based on an erroneous interpretation of law, the stop is illegal at the outset and any further actions by the police as a direct result of the stop are illegal"). [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
., SMITH, CURRAN, MONTOUR, AND OGDEN, JJ. 994 TP 22-01050 THE MATTER OF KELLY PHILLIPS, PETITIONER, vNEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND CITY OF ROCHESTER, RESPONDENTS. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
., SMITH, CURRAN, MONTOUR, AND OGDEN, JJ. 994 TP 22-01050 THE MATTER OF KELLY PHILLIPS, PETITIONER, vNEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND CITY OF ROCHESTER, RESPONDENTS. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 11:15 am
Earlier this year, the Superior Court upheld a non-owned, regularly used vehicles exclusion in its nonprecedential decision in the case of Erie Insurance v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In contrast to Smith’s approach, judge-shopping from the start in Missouri v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 6:52 am
This language comes straight from a Seventh Circuit case, Smith v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 3:49 pm
Online 78 (2010) Rosy Pictures and Renegade Officials: The Slow Death of Monroe v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm
” Smith v. [read post]
