Search for: "US v. Neal" Results 1 - 20 of 633
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2021, 12:09 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Start date On March 10, 2009, pursuant to a binding guilty plea agreement, appellant, Boisey Neal, pleaded guilty, in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, to three counts of robbery with a deadly or dangerous weapon, and one count of use of a handgun in the commission of a ... [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 5:34 am by Nathan Koppel
He has 15 Supreme Court arguments under his belt, including Hamdan v. [read post]
9 Sep 2007, 1:50 pm
US District Court habeas action was too late under Federal AEDPA because the defendant failed to appeal his original Nebraska state court conviction and obtained a direct appeal only years later to remedy his claim that his counsel was ineffective for failing to file a direct appeal on time. 063893P.pdf 09/06/2007 Keva Tyree O'Neal v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 4:50 pm by Tony Mauro
In an unusual filing with the Supreme Court this week, Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal said some of the information that the Court used in its recent Graham v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 5:50 pm
If there was a loser in Court today when the Justices heard arguments in US v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:03 am
O'Neal has an estimated half-million Instagram followers and 8.46 million Twitter followers.Binion v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:17 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) I attended oral argument this morning in Ashcroft v. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 11:16 pm by Orly Lobel
Neal Kumar Katyal and Thomas Schmidt just published an article in the Harvard Law Review criticizing the Roberts Court for, among other things, using the constitutional avoidance canon to articulate new constitutional norms, a use of the canon that they call “generative avoidance” (p. 2112). [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:57 pm
A crazy guy with crazy beliefs decides that a dozen people have committed "crimes" against him and hence he's allowed to file "liens" against their "oaths of office". [read post]