Search for: "US v. Ortiz"
Results 121 - 140
of 401
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2023, 2:53 pm
Ortiz. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:21 pm
In fact, what's to stop the class attorneys from selling out the class for pennies on the dollar, a problem that the Court will highlight in a later decision, Ortiz v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm
The People have the initial burden of going forward to show the “lack of any undue suggestiveness” (People v Chipp, 75 NY2d 327, 335 [1990]; People v Ortiz, 90 NY2d 533 [1997]). [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 11:18 am
Case Name: Yvonne Fowkes v. [read post]
30 Jun 2018, 4:08 am
In January of 2018, Aditya Bamzai argued before the Supreme Court as an amicus curiae in Ortiz v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:51 am
The Feres Doctrine was articulated in Feres v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:51 am
The Feres Doctrine was articulated in Feres v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:51 am
The Feres Doctrine was articulated in Feres v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:51 am
The Feres Doctrine was articulated in Feres v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 9:09 am
Burge v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 3:06 pm
In Galaviz, v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 6:00 am
” He suggests that the Supreme Court’s decision in the recent case of Ortiz v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:16 am
Dismissal in consideration of the misconduct proven not a viewed as "shocking" Ortiz v Safir, App. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
" Agreeing with the Supreme Court that the "differential treatment of Spanish-speaking and non-Spanish speaking employees was rationally related to a legitimate government interest," the Appellate Division held that the respondents "did not violate [the Plaintiffs'] equal protection rights under the NY or US Constitution. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
" Agreeing with the Supreme Court that the "differential treatment of Spanish-speaking and non-Spanish speaking employees was rationally related to a legitimate government interest," the Appellate Division held that the respondents "did not violate [the Plaintiffs'] equal protection rights under the NY or US Constitution. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
Rost v. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 7:11 pm
Rascon-Ortiz, 994 F.2d at 753. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 3:43 pm
Supreme Court in Riley v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 1:14 pm
Similarly, in Ortiz v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 11:43 am
Having said the above, the next point of discussion with someone consulting with him would be to point out the case, Carlotta Ortiz and Mario Zepeda v. [read post]
