Search for: "US v. Parsons"
Results 1 - 20
of 264
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am
The BBC explains why the US is going after the popular social media app. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:06 am
On 19 April 2024, Farbey J handed down judgement in the case of Parsons v Atkinson [2024] EWHC 888 (KB) in favour of the defendant. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am
Reserved Judgments Harrison v Cameron, heard 26 March 2024 (Steyn J) BW Legal Services Limited v Trustpilot, heard 7 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Unity Plus Healthcare Limited v Clay and others, heard 1 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Parsons v Atkinson, heard 26 and 27 February 2024 (Farbey J) Vince v Associated Newspapers, heard 19 February 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Wilson… [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
It noted, quoting Justice Byron White’s concurring opinion in Furman v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
Other signatories include the US, Australia, Canada, Mexico, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Philippines, Singapore, and Chinese Taipei. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am
The offender sent an indecent photo of himself to a woman in her 60s using WhatsApp and a child through iMessage. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am
Internet and Social Media As discussed further below, the US House of Representatives has passed a landmark bill that could see TikTok banned in the USA. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 5:04 pm
Companies use real-time biddi [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am
Between 26 to 28 February 2024, there was a trial in the case of Parsons v Atkinson QB-2021-004305 before Farbey J in Manchester. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am
The ICO also published new guidance for all organisations considering using people’s biometric data. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 1:35 am
On 23 January 2024, there was a pre-trial review before Chamberlain J in the case of Parsons v Atkinson QB-2021-004305. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am
On Tuesday 22 January 2024, there will be a pre-trial review in Parsons v Atkinson QB-2021-004305. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 7:55 am
The plaintiffs in Held v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
The case of King v Victor Parsons & Co [1973] 1 WLR 29 examined the situation where a person acted recklessly “like the man who turns a blind eye” determining that a person who “refrained from further inquiry lest awareness of a risk should prove to be correct, was said to be in the same position as a person who acted knowingly”. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 9:10 am
” Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 2:45 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:30 am
We hope you can join us, online, for our Constitution Day event on September 14th, 2023, at 3 p.m. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:45 pm
[ii] But one also speaks to the relationship between a domus and its dominus—its lord, master, owner, or overseer (perhaps captured by the old term 掌握 (Zhǎngwò) with its sense of also understanding things and making use of them). [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:58 am
While there, she gained fame for “saving” Major League Baseball with her strike-ending decision in Silverman v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 1:40 pm
ET: The Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society hosted a live event to analyze oral arguments before the Supreme Court in Gonzales v. [read post]
