Search for: "US v. Patrick Smith"
Results 1 - 20
of 235
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2008, 10:09 am
Austin Chronicle writer Jordan Smith reports on the Supreme Court's decision to review Kennedy v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:48 am
Co. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 8:20 pm
In Kienitz v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 11:14 am
Decertification of the Class In the unpublished opinion of Smith v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 11:14 am
Decertification of the Class In the unpublished opinion of Smith v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 8:20 pm
In Kienitz v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:59 pm
Names define us; I think it was Daniel Patrick Moynihan who pointed out that you were more likely to be treated as Irish if your father was named "Hogan" than if your mother was. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 3:18 am
At Procedurally Taxing, Patrick Smith suggests that, although Perez “is clearly significant in its direct application, . . . [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:09 pm
Smith was drawn to replace him. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 7:15 pm
Patrick v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:06 am
The US Supreme Court ruled Friday in 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 3:26 pm
Foster, et al. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 3:26 pm
Foster, et al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 10:04 am
Oliva; Debra Oliva-Foster, & Patrick A. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 9:46 pm
In Microsoft v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 6:01 pm
Christopher Smith, Plaintiff, represented by Ramona Veronica Ladwig, Kazerouni Law Group, Anthony Patrick Chester, Hyde & Swigart & Seyed Abbas Kazerounian, Kazerouni Law Group APC.Moss Law Firm PC, Defendant, represented by Rebecca Anne Moss, Moss Law Firm PC & Michael Allen Moss, Moss Law Firm PC.MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDERSIDNEY A. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 11:25 am
Zuschek[Affirmed; Beier; February 14, 2020]Improper use of prior misdemeanor for criminal history and to elevate battery to felonyState v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 4:18 pm
” Therefore, Kagan suggested, the dispute in Smith’s case is not about the content of the speech, but instead Smith’s resistance to its use in a same-sex wedding. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:37 am
Pascale LorberThe United Kingdom Supreme court confirmed on 13 June 2018 in the case of Pimlico v Smith what another three lower courts had already decided in the same case: that attempts by employers to label workers as self-employed under elaborate contractual arrangements can be unravelled by the judiciary to benefit the individuals. [read post]
3 May 2022, 5:01 am
From Justice Christopher Barry-Smith in Tuvell v. [read post]
