Search for: "US v. Paul Alexander" Results 1 - 20 of 201
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2012, 7:17 am by Erwin Chemerinsky
To be clear, constitutional theory did not begin with Alexander Bickel. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 3:52 am
 Many of the marks applied for or registered by the applicant consist of common names, such as ANNA, JESSICA, JULIA, ALAN, HOWARD, CHRISTINE, ELIZABETH, RYAN, PAUL, PETER or other words, such as the names of colours, BLUE, SAND, EBONY, EMERALD. [read post]
4 May 2010, 3:00 pm by Matt Sundquist
  He once criticized a majority opinion as the majority’s “attempt to justify its parsimonious construction of a very important statute” (Alexander v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
From Magistrate Judge Robert Norway's report and recommendation in Frank v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:13 pm by Kathryn Watts
  Indeed, when Alexander Bickel wrote The Least Dangerous Branch in 1962 and reflected on the Court’s passive virtues, he noted that the writ of certiorari thrusts the Court into a political role that is “professedly discretionary. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:54 am
Paul then addressed innocent infringement defences in patent law, reviewing Schutz v Werit, but mercifully skipped trade marks since quite enough had already been said by other speakers on trade marks today. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:32 am by Steve Vladeck
After all, “passive” could be just about the most inapt word to use to describe a Court that just decided Arizona v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 4:12 pm
That would take us back to the dispute over the legitimacy of Brown v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:59 am by Lawrence Solum
Paul, in which the majority found a municipal ordinance against cross burning to be unconstitutional. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 5:47 am by INFORRM
  In Canada, a political candidate used Twitter to tell a critic to ‘Go blow your brains out you waste of sperm… Your mother should have used that coat hanger’. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:41 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Turner v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:40 pm by Bexis
Nor did Paul Molitor’s admitted cocaine use keep him out of the Hall.Of course, none of them used banned substances for performance enhancement ? [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 12:36 pm
Rock Against Racism, 491 U.S. 781, 795 n.5 (1989); see also Alexander v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by Sarah Sutherland
Special thanks goes to the most prolific authors on the site: Karim Renno founding partner at Renno & Vathilakis (CanLII Connects) John Polyzogopoulos partner at Blaney McMurtry (CanLII Connects) Russell Alexander principal at Russell Alexander Collaborative Family Lawyers (CanLII Connects) Paul Daly University Senior Lecturer in Public Law, University of Cambridge and the Derek Bowett Fellow in Law at Queens’ College, Cambridge (CanLII Connects) Sean Bawden… [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 8:55 am by WSLL
Robinson.Representing Qwest Corporation: Paul J. [read post]