Search for: "US v. Paul Davis"
Results 101 - 120
of 495
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2015, 7:30 am
Eclairs proposed resolutions seeking the removal of Dr Paul Davies as CEO and Mr Peter Dixon as Commercial Director and the appointment of three alternate directors, one of whom was Mr Ratskkevych who, unbeknownst to JKX, was one of the beneficial owners of Glengary. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:59 am
Supreme Court case, Paul v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:36 am
Dionne at The Washington Post, Michelangelo Signorile at The Huffington Post, Paul Collins and Lori Ringhand at Slate, Seth Davis at PrawfsBlawg, Rick Hasen at the Election Law Blog, and Carolyn Shapiro at the ACS Blog. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 9:54 am
Davis v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 1:13 am
Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Rena Paul of counsel), for respondent. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:07 pm
Chicago Cubs v. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
When I joined Verio, there were about 200 of us. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:20 am
Virginia, 2002) and for juvenile offenders (Roper v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 1:19 am
Case Name: Iseli v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:35 am
” In the Boston Globe and (separately) at ACSblog, Martha Davis criticizes the result in Flores-Villar v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 8:24 am
Div. 2005) (quoting Davis v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 4:28 pm
The two lead claimants, David Davis MP and Tom Watson MP, were represented by Liberty. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 8:57 am
[MD-7] - 7/12/2007 Rep Davis, Danny K. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:01 pm
But perhaps more importantly, Justice O’Connor’s abandonment (apparently with Justice Kennedy’s encouragement) of ISL shows us there was never a majority of Justices at the time of B v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:02 pm
The Seventh Circuit (and a few others have follow) includes the following factors to be used: (1) how strong is the plaintiff’s showing of discriminatory effect; (2) is there some evidence of discriminatory intent, though not enough to satisfy the constitutional standard of Washington v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 4:20 pm
On 30 March 2015, the Upper Tribunal gave judgment in the case of Department of Health v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:19 am
In the following guest post Paul A. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 9:17 am
July 22, 2015); Davis v. [read post]
