Search for: "US v. Richard Hicks" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2013, 10:17 am
In a lesson about using “flimsy grounds” for stopping people on suspicion of texting while driving, an Ontario Superior Court judge has thrown out an alcohol-related conviction after a cop stopped a driver he thought had a cellphone in his hand while at a red light.The officer “clearly operated on a hunch,” says Richard Litkowski, an associate at Hicks Adams LLP who represented Imran Mughal on the appeal of his conviction in R. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 7:03 am
The seminar rounded off with Richard Davis covering the recent Meter-Tech LLC v British Gas Trading Limited [2016] EWHC 2278 (Pat) decision. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 1:04 pm
“They dropped us on our heads and then threw us under the bus. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
At Oxford, he also studied under John Hicks (famous for his contribution to welfare economics, including the formulation of what is now called “Kaldor-Hicks efficiency”). [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 6:51 am by Nabiha Syed
Buffalo News reports on the effect that last week’s decision in Florence v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 1:06 pm
Hicks, Chief Cook aboard the vessel, filed suit in Texas claiming unseaworthiness of the vessel for failing to better protect the crew from pirates. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 8:59 am by Garrett Hinck
Shannon Togawa Mercer posted the government’s memo in the case against Paul Manafort Jr. and Richard Gates III asking the court to set conditions on their release, designate the case as complex and notify the defendants the government intended to use specific foreign bank records. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:54 pm by Wessen Jazrawi
R (on the application of Hicks & Ors) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis  [2012] EWHC 1947 (Admin). [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
Suppose, finally, that the Court next term holds in Levine that there is implied preemption in prescription drug cases and demolishes the "changes being effected" and other global arguments plaintiffs have used to oppose preemption across the board.What then? [read post]