Search for: "US v. Rodriguez" Results 81 - 100 of 1,462
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2010, 9:50 am by Meg Martin
Summary of Decision issued May 14, 2010Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Rodriguez v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 6:54 pm
Today, the Supreme Court released its decision and opinion in Rodriguez v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 6:01 am
Civil Service Commission’s disqualification of candidate for failure to cooperate in a background investigation for appointment sustainedMatter of Rodriguez v County of Nassau, 2011 NY Slip Op 00384, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe Nassau County Civil Service Commission wrote to Sebastian E. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 10:44 am
Landau.The complaint in Landau is the new-style complaint which the RIAA first used in Interscope v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 4:00 pm
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 3:57 am
Using employer’s computer to store sexually explicit files results in recommendation the employee be terminated Human Resources Admin. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 11:36 pm
" Someone like Rodriguez, who has been convicted of a crime, can use a habeas petition to challenge the conviction. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 11:50 am by Steven Wildberger
In a 6-3 decision by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the majority held in Rodriguez v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 8:24 am
"The (Potentially) Monumental Significance of the Jennings Supplemental Briefing Order": Today at "Just Security," Steve Vladeck has a post that begins, "On November 30, the US Supreme Court heard oral argument in Jennings v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 12:12 pm by Joel R. Brandes
In Rodriguez v Yanez, 2016 WL 1212412 (5th Cir., 2016) Appellant Pedro Antonio Flores Rodriguez (“Flores”) and Appellee Yolanda Ivonne Salgado Yanez (“Salgado”) were the parents of A.S.F.S., an eleven-year-old girl. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:54 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
   In Rodriguez, the Ninth Circuit panel condemned the use incentive agreements in class actions. [read post]