Search for: "US v. Ronald Roberts Smith"
Results 1 - 20
of 82
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2011, 12:26 am
Marcus Cole, Ronald D. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 2:56 am
RONALD A. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am
At ACS, Robert Smith discusses the decision, noting that it “strongly suggests that five justices on the Court” believe that a sentencer is required “to find that a juvenile is permanently incorrigible before imposing a LWOP sentence. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:53 am
In Stern v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:02 pm
President Ronald Reagan’s first choice for that slot was Robert Bork, who famously was denied confirmation on the ground that he was too extreme a conservative. [read post]
14 May 2009, 8:21 am
Carroll Smith, Defendant-Appellant.2009 WL 1324162(N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 6:49 am
Robert Smith, Defendant-Appellant. 2009 WL 3296678(N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 9:14 am
Smith, 235 NJ Super 453 (Law Div.), aff’d 235 NJ Super 404 (App. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 11:40 pm
US Dept Agri Eastern District of Kentucky at Covington 07a0207n.06 2007/03/21 Lichtefeld v. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 10:03 am
Finding his sentence procedurally and substantively reasonable, we affirm 08b0021p.06 In re: Ronald Anderson v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 4:57 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Ronald Watson v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm
In practice, Roberts turned to public service, serving for four years as Associate Counsel to President Ronald Reagan. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 12:11 pm
Radtke, et al. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 12:11 pm
Radtke, et al. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 12:11 pm
Radtke, et al. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Smith. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
PUBLISHED OPINIONS Opinion Short Title/District 08a0415p.06 Smith v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:12 am
In 1981, a recommendation from Rehnquist got Roberts a position in the newly installed Reagan administration, as a special assistant to Attorney General William French Smith. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 3:52 am
” At Procedurally Taxing, Carlton Smith considers the implications for tax law of the Supreme Court’s decision in Fort Bend County v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 3:44 am
Smith, in which Justice Antonin Scalia “concluded that courts could not use the First Amendment’s free exercise clause to carve out exemptions from ‘neutral laws of general applicability,’” in a new case, Ricks v. [read post]
