Search for: "US v. Simmons" Results 1 - 20 of 748
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2024, 7:02 am by Ellena Erskine
EDT, the justices will hear oral argument in Moyle v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 4:11 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
[Simmons Little Bluestone LP v Nationwide Insurance Co of Florida case no 2:22-cv-02822 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Western Division] [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 4:11 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
[Simmons Little Bluestone LP v Nationwide Insurance Co of Florida case no 2:22-cv-02822 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Western Division] [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:49 pm by Jocelyn Bosse
The event, co-hosted by the IPKat, will be held at SimmonsSimmons’ offices in Citypoint, Moorgate. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 10:42 pm by Eleonora Rosati
Retro-KatsThe fifth annual Retromark conference returns for another afternoon of in-person trade mark law and practice hosted by Darren Meale of Simmons & Simmons and the IPKat on Tuesday 7 May. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by Eleonora Rosati
Darren Meale of Simmons & Simmons presents the thirteenth volume in his rundown of notable trade mark cases over the past six months. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 1:16 pm by Giles Peaker
The total of £48,786.32 was subject to the Simmons v Castle 10% uplift, giving an award of £53,664.95. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 9:09 pm by Ilana Korchia
In response to this investigation, on June 7, 2023, Wawona Frozen Foods of Clovis, California, initiated a voluntary recall of year-old packages of Wawona brand Organic DayBreak Blend 4-lb. bags that were distributed to Costco Wholesale stores in Arizona, California, Colorado, Utah, and Washington from April 15, 2022, to June 26, 2022, with “Use By” dates of 9/23/2023, 9/29/2023, 9/30/2023, and 10/18/2023: Best If Used By 09/23/2023Best If Used By… [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
This past fiscal year, the Commission brought a number of actions charging firms for using employment agreements that expressly violated the plain language of the rule in various ways, including by: requiring employees to attest that they had not filed a complaint against the company with any federal agency;[7] or requiring employees to waive their rights to financial whistleblower awards;[8] or requiring departing former employees to provide notice to the company if they received a request… [read post]