Search for: "US v. Smart"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,006
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2013, 2:18 pm
Neighbors for Smart Rail v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 3:49 am
Former NYC employee fined $10,000 by the NYC ConflictsConflicts of Interest Board v Smart, OATH Index No. 2588/09In June 2009, ALJ Kara Miller found that a former City employee, Pauline Smart, violated the City Conflicts of Interest Law by using her position as an eligibility specialist to obtain personal information about a welfare recipient which the specialist used to obtain a cell phone [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 11:44 am
Smart panel. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 9:26 am
Wiretap Laws Forbid Use of Smart Phone Apps to Record Conversations appeared first on Pennsylvania Labor & Employment Blog. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 12:58 pm
That, juxtaposed with the existence of foreseeable risk in execution of smart contracts poses a potentially huge hurdle to the exponentially growing use of block-chain technology. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 4:15 am
These issues of fairness and fair use are played out in the recent Oracle v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:48 pm
In Neighbors for Smart Rail v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 2:40 am
Olin Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 2:01 pm
Use it wisely. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:31 am
You'll discover that it's not quite the compliment that you might otherwise take it to be.It means that you're smart enough to open a bank account. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 6:53 am
In Smallwood v. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 1:29 pm
Perez v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 6:23 am
But a smart jury foreperson alone isn't enough: in last year's Oracle v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 6:15 am
On June 25, 2014, the US Supreme Court unanimously settled US law in Riley v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 11:50 am
by Dennis Crouch iRobot Corp. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 10:16 pm
In a lengthy decision, a split Tenth Circuit panel upheld the reasonableness of a below-guideline sentence in a sex offense case in US v. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 2:19 pm
The Supreme Court was clear in Carpenter v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 2:03 am
Maxon conceded that the patents were directed to the abstract concept of increasing user control over services, and the district court correctly found that the patent claims recited only generic computing processes using functional language (Maxon, LLC v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 5:47 am
Thus the Case of the Week is Jordan v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 7:37 am
July 17, 2020) The post Local Craigslist Ads Are Part of Interstate Commerce–US v. [read post]
