Search for: "US v. Spencer"
Results 41 - 60
of 772
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2018, 9:46 am
In Spencer v. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 10:28 am
The panel found, see Spencer v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 8:47 am
The ruling in Steel v Spencer Road LLP provides helpful guidance on the circumstances in which a bonus clawback will not constitute a restraint of trade, though employers should be mindful that not all such provisions will be enforceable. [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 3:36 am
See: R. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
In R. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 8:58 am
Since the R. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 7:27 am
(Our thanks to Spencer Turner for this guest post) Brent Council v Shah and Others, unreported 29 January 2018 (Crown Ct (Harrow)) The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (‘POCA’) has been successfully used by Brent Council against landlords for breach of licencing conditions. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 10:48 am
In Russell Road Food & Beverage, LLC v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 9:42 am
In the famous case R.A.V. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 10:42 am
However, in light of the recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in the case of R. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 4:36 pm
In People v Spencer (4th Dept 9/30/11) the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, reversed a conviction and vacated a Superior Court Information (SCI) where the defendant pled guilty pursuant to a SCI after he was indicted for a crime arising from the same incident. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 4:36 pm
In People v Spencer (4th Dept 9/30/11) the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, reversed a conviction and vacated a Superior Court Information (SCI) where the defendant pled guilty pursuant to a SCI after he was indicted for a crime arising from the same incident. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 2:46 pm
In Spencer v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
‘Spencer v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 2:56 am
The clearest and most recent indication of this comes in a recent decision of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in Porrits & Spencer v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:55 am
He did not serve any s.21 Notice (of any sort, vide Spencer v Taylor). [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:55 am
He did not serve any s.21 Notice (of any sort, vide Spencer v Taylor). [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 10:37 pm
The Ninth Circuit issued three opinions in Spencer v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 11:36 am
This is a case that, in my opinion, is crying out for a sub nom and I’m going to use the Slaw platform to try and start a groundswell of support for R v Spencer to be more commonly known as: IP Freely. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 6:51 am
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
