Search for: "US v. Spencer"
Results 81 - 100
of 772
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2023, 12:55 pm
Spencer Elden gets photographed as a four-month old baby as he's swimming naked in a pool. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 12:22 pm
SCC Cases (Lexum) - Judgments to be Rendered in Appeals: 34644 Matthew David Spencer v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
At issue was whether the Charter applied to the search which led to the discovery of cocaine in her possession and whether the trial judge erred in the use and … France (Republic) v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 1:20 pm
Spencer (prisoner rights, Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act)* State Courts Bulletin Cases featured:In re Morris (Indian Child Welfare Act, notice) In re D.L and K.L. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 2:54 am
Likewise in the High Court, the Claimant wished to rely on them in the High Court in relation to their case on distinctiveness (and not as evidence of confusion).It is clear from Interflora 1 (Interflora v Marks and Spencer [2012] EWCA Civ 1501) and Interflora 2 (Interflora v Marks and Spencer [2013] EWCA Civ 319) that surveys should only be permitted if they are of "real value". [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 8:46 am
Legal Guilt and Right v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 2:47 pm
I am thinking here of Spencer v Taylor (which we analysed here), Charalambous v Ng, and now Edwards v Kumarasamy. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 8:18 pm
Spencer and James C. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 1:12 pm
IndianaUniv-v-MidAmerica-Complaint-logo [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 7:03 am
This post was drafted by Paul Jacobson and Andrew Brought, attorneys in the Kansas City, Missouri, office of Spencer Fane LLP. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 12:03 pm
Mark v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 3:26 pm
It's now November 9, and you advise us at 7:27 a.m. that you can't make it. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 1:28 pm
Dunn-McCampbell Royalty Interest Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 7:21 pm
The Doe v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 4:38 am
In the Interflora case, part of the allegation of trade mark infringement was that Marks & Spencer did not employ negative matching when using, among other words and generic terms, the keyword which also constituted its trade mark Interflora. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 12:07 pm
(Eugene Volokh) A Ninth Circuit panel issued three very interesting opinions on this subject today in Spencer v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 5:00 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited, [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch). [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 7:00 am
Spencer, 2016 U.S. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
In Gomez v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm
Spencer EPA first issued its Boiler MACT Rule on September 13, 2004. [read post]
