Search for: "US v. Spencer" Results 101 - 120 of 776
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2016, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Judge Katzmann distinguished both Google France SARL v Louis Vuitton Malletier SA and Interflora Inc and Anor v Marks & Spencer, determining that the wording used in the EU legislation was not an equivalent to the Australian wording, especially with the difference in 'using in the course of trade' (per Article 5 of the first Trade Mark Directive) and 'used as a trademark' under section 120 of the Australian Act. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 10:48 am by Kelly Becker
by Megan Spencer     On November 10, 2010, EPA released guidance for states and permitting authorities to begin including greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions in PSD and Title V permitting processes entitled PSD and Title V Permitting Guidance For Greenhouse Gases. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 9:50 am by Cicely Wilson
Spencer, US 1st Cir. (1/17/14)Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal LawSixty-four-year-old Plaintiff was born anatomically male but suffered from severe gender identity disorder. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A Conspiracy of Hunches: Roger Stone trial set to start this week San Francisco Chronicle – Devlin Barrett, Spencer Hsu, and Manuel Roig-Franzia (Washington Post) | Published: 11/4/2019 Roger Stone is on trial in federal court, where prosecutors plan to dive back into an episode of political chicanery, alleged lies, and conspiratorial texts that parallels the nascent impeachment inquiry into his longtime friend President Trump. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Spencer: resell data: if you’re comfortable with a first party seller using the data, why not allow resale? [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch). [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
New Judgment: Cape Intermediate Holdings Limited v Dring [2019] UKSC 38 On appeal from: [2018] EWCA Civ 1795 This appeal considered the powers of the court pursuant to the Civil Procedure Rules or its inherent jurisdiction to permit access to documents used in litigation to which the applicant was not a party. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 6:40 pm
In federal court this is known as an Anders brief (Anders v California, 386 US 738). [read post]