Search for: "US v. Thomas Davis"
Results 1 - 20
of 721
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2015, 8:50 am
On June 18, 2015, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Davis v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 4:55 pm
Thomas, the plaintiffs and the defendant have filed their briefs in response to Judge Davis's May 15th order.The US Department of Justice took no position on the issue. [read post]
15 May 2008, 8:19 am
Judge Davis wound up agreeing with the RIAA's argument, discarded the instruction he had originally decided to use, and accepted the improper instruction requested by Mr. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
For example, the Court’s 1967 decision in Loving v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 11:57 am
The US Supreme Court Monday denied a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by a former Rowan County, Kentucky, clerk who was sued for refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples following the landmark Obergefell v. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 12:54 pm
In Capitol v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 9:13 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 8:16 am
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Davis v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 6:20 pm
The case is Capitol Records Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 10:14 am
Thomas begins at the link. [read post]
Wired.com reports that Judge Davis indicated he is likely to declare a mistrial in Capitol v. Thomas
4 Aug 2008, 2:31 pm
According to a report by Wired.com, Judge Davis indicated he is likely to grant a mistrial in Capitol v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 6:46 am
Davis v. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 5:53 am
As noted in the New York Times’ editorial, Justice Anthony Kennedy seized the opportunity to write a concurring opinion in Davis v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 8:19 am
Davis v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 1:52 pm
See Donovan v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 9:40 am
Thomas Y. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 7:03 am
In Capitol Records v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 7:34 pm
Thomas's conduct was motivated by her desire to obtain the copyrighted music for her own use. [read post]
6 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
The paper's coverage terms Judge Davis's May 15th decision both "extraordinary" and "admirable", and points out what none of the briefs have pointed out -- that the Atlantic v. [read post]
