Search for: "US v. Vogel" Results 1 - 20 of 138
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2009, 9:00 am
For a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Jordan v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:05 pm
Case C‑242/14 Saatgut-Treuhandverwaltungs GmbH v Gerhard und Jürgen Vogel GbR, Jürgen Vogel, Gerhard Vogel is a request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) made by the Landgericht Mannheim (Germany), on a Community plant variety matter. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 3:30 pm
The Vogels did not comply with that request.In July 2012, STV asked the Vogels to pay EUR 262.50, this being the full fee that would be due for licensed use of ‘Finita’ seeds (STV;s "C- Licence fee") as compensation for the damage suffered as a result of the undisclosed planting of that protected variety. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 10:23 am
In 1996, the US Supreme Court (Markman v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 1:20 am
Guests are Ray Beckerman, Eric Goldman, Colette Vogele, and Evan Brown, and Leo's joining us too (yay!). [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 8:05 am
Wages of Goddard, Wages & Vogel, Buffalo, Wyoming.Representing Appellee Neeman (Father): DaNece Day and Christopher R. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 9:02 am by Colette Vogele
Please send us your feedback and questions by emailing us at colette [at] rulesfortherevolution [dot] com. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 8:23 pm
1-9-2008 California:A City of Los Angeles ordinance authorizing the seizure and forfeiture of vehicles used to solicit prostitution is expressly preempted by state law, this district's Court of Appeal held yesterday.Citing the recent California Supreme Court decision in O'Connell v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 3:13 am
Wages of Goddard, Wages & Vogel, Buffalo, Wyoming.Representing Appellee Father: Mark L. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
But an analysis shows fewer women are using federal funds to cover childcare expenses this election cycle. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 4:30 am by Steve McConnell
  Last week's rulings on pretrial motions in Earp v. [read post]