Search for: "USA V COMBS" Results 1 - 20 of 37
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The district court properly evaluated the relevant likelihood of confusion factors in light of the evidence presented at trial, including overwhelming evidence of the commercial strength of VAGISIL brand products and Combe’s Eveready consumer survey and a brand recognition, or “fame,” survey (Combe Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 1:30 pm by Alan E. Sherman
Today’s sales tax opinion from the Texas Third Court of Appeals in Austin, Combs v. [read post]
The district court properly evaluated the relevant likelihood of confusion factors in light of the evidence presented at trial, including overwhelming evidence of the commercial strength of VAGISIL brand products and Combe’s Eveready consumer survey and a brand recognition, or “fame,” survey (Combe Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:30 pm by Cindy Cohn and Nadia Kayyali
Since Congress is in recess we have a month to go before this has any chance of getting to the floor, and we’ll be continuing to scour the bill with a fine-toothed comb. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 3:11 am
 October 21, 2020 - 11 AM: In re Hydro-Gear Limited Partnership, Serial No. 87641657 [Refusal to register ZT-1800 for "Land vehicle parts, namely, transaxles" on the ground that the proposed mark will be perceived merely as a model designation and therefore it fails to function as a trademark].October 22, 2020 - 2 PM: Combe Incorporated v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:35 am by Jay Willis
The Associated Press previews Ortiz v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:15 pm
Amnesty International USA, another challenge to warrantless surveillance under Section 702. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:07 am by Joshua Matz
”  At Los Angeles City Watch, Scottie Thomaston and Jacob Combs report on a media call about next steps in the Proposition 8 case of Perry v. [read post]