Search for: "USA V. DAVID COHEN"
Results 1 - 20
of 74
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2010, 7:16 am
Briefly: At TIME, Adam Cohen discusses Wal-Mart v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 2:20 pm
David G. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 3:04 pm
Yesterday the Court granted two new cases: Hall v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
The case, Clapper v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 1:49 pm
From a NYT account of Ledbetter v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:29 am
In Sackett v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:48 am
” At Bloomberg BNA, Chris Marr looks at American Business USA Corp. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:25 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Ivan Cohen discusses the impact of an amicus brief filed on behalf of neither party by one of the country’s leading scientists in Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:30 am
At the Volokh Conspiracy, David Post discusses a SCOTUSblog post by David Cohen explaining a “voting paradox” in the alignment of Justices in McDonald, in which five Justices favored incorporation of the Second Amendment against the states, but through two different methods. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Since the Supreme Court has observed, first in the seminal case of Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 6:06 am
” Joan Biskupic covers the case for USA Today, while Andrew Cohen of the Atlantic predicts that “no matter which way they vote, the justices will offer a trove of new talking points (and legal precedent) to everyone else who pays attention to this particular corner of the world of information technology. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:38 am
At the Constitutional Accountability Center, David H. [read post]
27 May 2011, 3:28 pm
Briefly: Yesterday in Camreta v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:03 am
For the Los Angeles Times, David Savage reports that the petitioner in Kahler v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 6:48 am
Morris and NLRB v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 6:59 am
” Andrew Cohen of the Atlantic rounds up some additional commentary, and suggests that Wal-Mart v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 4:37 am
” An overview of the new term comes from David Cohen at Rolling Stone, who observes that although “for most non-law professors, the cases on tap are real snoozefests,” “for reasons separate from the actual cases before the Court, this year could be one of the most consequential in recent history. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
Gobain Ceramics v. [read post]
