Search for: "USA V. MARK PERSON"
Results 1 - 20
of 609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2008, 4:59 am
Febal Cucine, S.p.A. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 12:26 am
Peter ReapA German company’s interactive website, through which it assisted customers with improving their software products, was sufficient to subject the company to federal personal jurisdiction for purposes of a trademark infringement suit brought by a Maine company that owned a federally registered mark, the U.S. [read post]
18 May 2014, 9:04 pm
When relying on a home registration, foreign applicants do not have to have used the trade mark prior to registration in the USA. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 3:27 am
Last Friday, the High Court granted special leave to appeal in 2 trade mark matters: Health World Ltd v Shin-Sun Australia Pty Ltd E & J Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan Australia Pty Limited Given only about 80 cases a year score this level of achievement, there are obviously big issues afoot. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 6:38 am
Ruggers, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 10:26 pm
The Implications and Consequences of United Kingdom Exit from the EU by Patrick J Birkinshaw, Andrea Biondi (eds,)€ 125 The post USA: Polar Electro Oy v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 2:22 am
TJX [successful 2(a) claim despite abandonment of personal name mark in the USA]; and noted the recent Fiat decision [a dilution case recognizing that activity outside the United States could result in the mark being well-known in the USA, even without any activity here].Text Copyright John L. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:21 am
In Exergen Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 4:19 am
January 11, 2018 - 11 AM: Standard Tools and Equipment Co. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 7:46 pm
linkKylie Minogue v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 7:27 am
It will be difficult for a Cuban trade mark applicant who lives in the United States and who travels around to avoid being found to be a bad faith trade mark applicant, being a person with previous knowledge of all those trade marks. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 4:17 pm
This morning the Court heard oral arguments in two cases involving the principle of “one person, one vote. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:30 pm
Words like “collect” and “target” have meanings for the NSA that no ordinary person would use. [read post]
11 May 2015, 10:12 pm
ObamaJewel v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 3:23 am
S.p.A. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:49 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:57 am
It seems Mr Brailsford may well have coined the mark and used it in the USA. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 5:11 pm
One Wholesaler v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:45 pm
ObamaJewel v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 6:30 am
This is a Video Privacy Protection Act case alleging that Gannett, the owner of USA Today, improperly disclosed personally identifiable information to Adobe. [read post]
