Search for: "USA V. THOMAS SMITH" Results 1 - 20 of 117
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2023, 6:03 am by Eugene Volokh
Snap, Inc., filed Monday, following and repeatedly quoting Justice Thomas's separate statement respecting denial of certiorari in Malwarebytes, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Not Just Clarence Thomas: Lower courts facing scrutiny over ethics, disclosures, too Yahoo News – John Fritze (USA Today) | Published: 9/25/2023 Americans were able to review financial disclosure reports for all nine justices on the U.S. [read post]
18 May 2023, 8:01 am by John Elwood
Most surprisingly to me, the court denied review in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Guardian Australia has announced the launch of Ben Roberts-Smith v the media, a special 5-episode podcast series about the Ben Roberts-Smith defamation trial. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
On 1 August 2022, judgment was handed down in Wright v McCormack [2022] EWHC 2068 (QB) by Chamberlain J. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia Lawyers for former soldier Ben Roberts-Smith, accused of committing war crimes and murder in Afghanistan, have told the federal court that the allegations are “a nonsense and … an embarrassment … based on conjecture, speculation and imprecise testimony,” as his long-running defamation trial enters its final phase. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian covers the latest delays in the defamation trial between ex-soldier Ben Roberts-Smith and the Age, Canberra Times and Sydney Morning Herald over allegations that he committed war crimes while on tour in Afghanistan. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am by John Elwood
Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch noted that they would have granted review in that case — just short of the four votes it takes to win review. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin and Marci A. Hamilton
In an unsigned, per curiam opinion, those five—Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett—reject Smith and adopt what many call a “most-favored nation” theory of the First Amendment. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:20 pm by Sandy Levinson
  And the most prominent public purveyors of patriotism are often "nationalists" committed to dubious notions of Making America Great Again or America First (or simply shouting out "USA, USA" at the Olympics; it is clear that Smith, altogether properly does not want to be associated with the latter, even as he is critical of the former. [read post]
Many readers will recall Marcus Smith J’s decision to refuse a PI (reported here and, after it was upheld by the Court of Appeal, here). [read post]