Search for: "USA v. 12 United States" Results 1 - 20 of 970
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am by INFORRM
United States As mentioned above, the US Senate has voted in favour of legislation that could ban TikTok in the country if its Chinese owners refuse to sell. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
 Louisiana Law     Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:22-CV-1114. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Another Toomey proposal, which was enacted into law as part of the 2023 National Defense Authorization Act and later codified as 12 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Sherica Celine
The rule was entitled “Independent Contractor Status Under the Fair Labor Standards Act” (commonly designated as 2021 IC Rule). 12 It marked a significant departure in emphasis from the economic reality test which the courts and the DOL previously adopted. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by INFORRM
United States The House of Representatives have passed the Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, a bill which has been characterised as having the power to ban TikTok. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
For the most part these trade disputes have been with the United States before NAFTA and Canada-U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:38 am by Mayela Celis
Part IV – Abortion in popular politics This Part begins with an excellent comparative public policy study between France and the United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm by ernst
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co v Campbell (2003): The Misguided Legacy of ProportionalityCatherine M Sharkey (New York University, USA)14. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:08 pm by NARF
(Discrimination; Class Action; Added Parties) United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 12:11 pm by Seth Jaffe
United States the 5th Circuit issued a decision interpreting the Supreme Court’s decision in Sackett v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
United States and then again in the 1990 decision, Employment Div. v. [read post]