Search for: "USA v. Crocker"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2014, 9:04 pm
This stems from a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board decision in Crocker Bank v CIBC, 223 U.S.P.Q. 909 (T.T.A.B. 1984), the correctness of which is open to doubt. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
AFFIRMED. 08a0024p.06 USA v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 12:45 pm
Jewel v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 3:41 pm
A more likely interpertation is, that materials purchased for mass production of such videos crossed state lines, is what Congress had in mind, not the construction used to charge Blum in this case.For reasons that are a mystery to this writer, it seens this was not brought up on appeal, and the appeals court went off on a tangent of possession of child porn, see appellate court decision: USA -v- Gregory Blum . [read post]
