Search for: "USA v. Kimberly Robinson" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Robinson, Co-Editor-in-Chief, Workers’ Compensation Emerging Issues Analysis (LexisNexis) As we move through the third decade of the twenty-first century, the United States remains a land of contradictions. [read post]
17 May 2022, 5:48 am by James Romoser
Here’s the Tuesday morning read: Dividing on Ideological Lines and Breaking Little New Ground in FEC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: Kimberly Robinson and Jordan Rubin report at Bloomberg Law that “[t]he U.S. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
” At Bloomberg Law, Jordan Rubin and Kimberly Robinson report that the May sitting “will also be notable for featuring an argument between two female lawyers to start the two-week session. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 7:45 am by Kalvis Golde
” At Bloomberg Law (via How Appealing), Kimberly Robinson reports that guidance issued by the U.S. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
Kimberly Robinson reports at Bloomberg Law that “[t]he Trump administration’s focus on immigration has crowded the U.S. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
” At Bloomberg Law, Kimberly Robinson reports that “57% of adults surveyed said the judiciary was the most trusted branch,” but “Republicans had a higher confidence level in the Supreme Court overall. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
Kimberly Robinson reports at Bloomberg Law that in another immigration case, Nasrallah v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
At Bloomberg Law, Kimberly Robinson reports that yesterday the court “issued guidance for filers of friend-of-the-court briefs that ‘clears up a number of contested issues previously resolved through word-of-mouth lore among practitioners,’ one of them said. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Kimberly Robinson reports at Bloomberg Law that the “justices abided by their new guidance suggesting a two-minute quiet period at the start of advocates’ oral arguments, though some justices were quick to jump in at the two minutes’ conclusion. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 3:38 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At Bloomberg Law, Kimberly Robinson reports that the “Los Angeles Rams want the U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:41 pm by Kalvis Golde
Early coverage comes from Adam Liptak of The New York Times; Robert Barnes of The Washington Post; Andrew Chung of Reuters; Jessica Gresko of the AP; Greg Stohr of Bloomberg; Ariane de Vogue and Devan Cole of CNN; Richard Wolf of USA Today; Josh Gerstein of Politico; Mark Walsh of Education Week; Todd Ruger of Roll Call; Kimberly Robinson of Bloomberg Law; Ellen Gilmer of E&E News; and Tony Mauro of The National Law Journal.… [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:36 pm by Jon Levitan
Additional coverage comes from Nina Totenberg and Domenico Montanaro of NPR; Richard Wolf of USA Today; Mark Walsh of Education Week; Josh Gerstein of Politico; Kimberly Robinson of Bloomberg Law; an additional article from Robinson examines the seven opinions written by the justices. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
Kimberly Robinson reports for Bloomberg Law that the ruling “handed Virginia Republicans what could be a costly defeat ahead of the state’s off-year elections in November. [read post]
23 May 2019, 3:29 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At Bloomberg Law’s Cases and Controversies podcast, “Kimberly Robinson and Jordan Rubin break down the 5-4 decision in Herrera v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
” In the latest episode of Bloomberg Law’s Cases and Controversies podcast, Jordan Rubin and Kimberly Robinson discuss this week’s Supreme Court decisions, as well as “the growing chasm between the court’s conservative and liberal blocs over the death penalty, which was exposed this week in unusual dueling opinions in a previously decided matter. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
” At Bloomberg Law, Kimberly Robinson reports that during yesterday afternoon’s other argument, in Rehaif v. [read post]