Search for: "USA v. Mark Lay" Results 1 - 20 of 85
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2018, 6:08 am by Cheryl Beise
The Board’s decision to sustain Frito Lay’s opposition to registration of the marks on the ground of mere descriptiveness was affirmed. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:30 pm by Cindy Cohn and Nadia Kayyali
Your Support This post lays out why we decided to support USA Freedom, and also many of our concerns. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 2:30 am by John L. Welch
July 24, 2013 - 2 PM: Frito-Lay North America, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
* Trade mark troubles in the Galápagos islandsWe are accustomed to view a brand in positive terms, as a valuable asset of its owner. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 6:59 am by James Bickford
  Today, the Court hears argument in McComish v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 2:51 am by John L. Welch
Phard S.p.A., Opposition No. 91172486 [Section 2(d) opposition to ZU ELEMENTS (Stylized) for various paper goods, leather goods, and clothing, in light of various registered and common law marks comprising or containing the mark ELEMENTS for identical goods].July 13- 2 PM: In re Roc USA, LLC , Serial No. 77044525 [refusal to register the mark ROC USA for business management consulting services and for educational services in the field of community… [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed at TC Palm, Mark Miller weighs in on American Legion v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the Library of Law and Liberty, Mark Pulliam reviews “Scalia Speaks,” a new compilation of “dozens of Scalia’s best speeches (out of hundreds that he delivered), on a variety of subjects, to both legal and lay audiences. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 1:10 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeInsurance Fraud Conviction Vacated; Lay Opinion Testimony on Knowledge of Fraud Wrongly Admitted United States, appellee v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
City of Riviera Beach, Florida, United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:48 pm
Essex Trading Standards v Wallati Singh [2009] EWHC 520 (Admin) is a Divisional Court (England and Wales) decision from 3 March which the IPKat nearly missed completely. [read post]