Search for: "USA v. Michael Baker" Results 1 - 20 of 59
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Hughes v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:03 pm by Andrew Hamm
This morning the Court heard oral argument in King v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:36 pm by Andrew Hamm
Gorod at USA Today, Jeffrey Toobin at CNN, attorneys at Fisher & Phillips, Aaron Yelowitz, Ilya Shapiro, Roger Pilon, and Michael F. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm by Andrew Hamm
This morning the Court announced its decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Christie v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
Proctor    Southern District of Ohio at Columbus 08a0398n.06  2008/07/01 Baker v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
Proctor    Southern District of Ohio at Columbus 08a0398n.06  2008/07/01 Baker v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:40 pm by Molly Runkle
This morning the Court granted review in United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:48 am by Edith Roberts
” At Bloomberg BNA, Chris Marr looks at American Business USA Corp. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 5:05 pm
Michael Mukasey    Board of Immigration Appeals 08a0630n.06 USA v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
For USA Today, Richard Wolf and Gregory Korte report that “President Trump added five names Friday to his list of potential Supreme Court justices. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 3:22 am by Amy Howe
In USA Today, Richard Wolf previews Monday’s oral arguments in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
” At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf highlights three objections to a key hypothetical example offered by the solicitor general on behalf of the baker. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for USA Today, Brandon Garrett urges the justices to review Dassey v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm by legalinformatics
Veden; Univ of Arkansas, Fayetteville: Dissonant Voices, Democratice Choices: The Rhetoric of Apportionment in Baker v. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 8:09 am
We agree with the United States, VACATE the sentences, and REMAND for re-sentencing. 07a0346p.06 2007/08/28 USA  v. [read post]