Search for: "USA v. Michael Wood"
Results 1 - 20
of 45
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Over the last three years we have followed Canada’s ongoing battle to protect and reserve it supply management system for dairy and poultry products in place and negotiated for since the original GATT negotiations concluded in 1947. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm
IPSO 13241-21 Wood v Helensburgh Advertiser, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 01139-22 Mehson v Mail Online, 2 Privacy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 02465-22 Gleeson v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021), No breach – after investigation 02466-22 Gleeson v mirror.co.uk, 1 Accuracy… [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
Supreme Court Industrial Union Dep’t v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
Pix Credit: Michael A. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
The United States has taken the next step in its trade dispute with Canada and asked for the establishment of a panel to examine its complaint regarding Canada’s administration of its tariff-rate quotas (TRQ) allocations for 14 dairy products.[1] In its request, the United States Trade Representative (USTR) [2] claims that Canada’s allocation of import quotas exclusively to “producers” violates the terms of Canada’s commitments in the schedule to annex 2-B[3] of the… [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 3:50 am
Table of Contents Key Findings Introduction What Is the Tax Gap and What Proposals Are Available? [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 8:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm
In his congressional testimony, Inspector General Michael Horowitz described his report as “the product of a comprehensive and exhaustive review” (C-SPAN at 57:07; see also, e.g., C-SPAN at 2:55:10, 2:56:20). [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
The Panopticon Blog has covered the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1780. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 4:08 pm
Mondaq has published a piece by Michael Statham on the Supreme Court’s Haaretz.com v Goldhar: “Libel Tourism and Forum Shopping”. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am
” Andrew Keane Woods analyzes the argument at Lawfare. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the USA, one of the major musical works collection societies (and there are now four!) [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 11:31 am
Dwyer Instruments Inc v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 4:03 am
The first is McWilliams v. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 4:05 pm
Michael Geist has examined the case of Google v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am
Petitions Granted with immediate Vacatur and Remand (GVR) Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
8 May 2016, 4:15 pm
Ms Wood also criticised the cost of privacy orders as she says that only the wealthy can afford protection. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:48 am
” And at Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger weighs in on the summary reversal in Woods v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm
On the same day Dingemans J gave judgment in Lokhova v Tymula ([2016] EWHC 225 (QB))(heard 26 and 27 January 2016). [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 7:30 am
WOOD v. [read post]
