Search for: "USA v. Rose Marks"
Results 1 - 20
of 55
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2015, 1:03 pm
The first of these is GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II [2015] EWHC 1405 (Ch), a 19 May decision of Mrs Justice Rose, sitting in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, on an appeal from a decision of the UK Intellectual Property Office. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 3:05 am
What is generic in one country may not be known or a well known trade mark in another in another (Polo in the UK v Polo in RSA; Kettle in the USA v Kettle in Europe; Xerox in the US and Xerox is RSA etc). [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
The first of these is GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II [2015] EWHC 1405 (Ch), a 19 May decision of Mrs Justice Rose, sitting in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, on an appeal from a decision of the UK Intellectual Property Office. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 1:38 am
Last week marked More Than Just a Game V - the London edition.MTJG (as it is known by those in the know) is an international series of academic-led conferences on Games and Interactive Entertainment Law attracting an international network of researchers and legal professionals who are passionate about the most successful and fastest-growing of the Creative Industries.Anne Rose (Mishcon de Reya) attended the conference and has provided this summary of some of the more IP… [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:39 am
This week’s filings in the challenges to the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act – which Lyle covered here and here – generated coverage from Joan Biskupic of the USA Today, Mark Sherman of the Associated Press, and Debra Cassens Weiss of the ABA Journal. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:52 am
In Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 10:59 am
| When passing off is enough to successfully oppose a trade mark | BREAKING: Sky's the limit for CJEU references in Sky v SkyKick trade mark battle | Influencers and undisclosed sponsored activities: where do we stand? [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 10:30 am
USA: Skidmore v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 3:55 pm
Williams Revisited (see Phillip Morris USA v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 10:15 am
Word Mark 5868255 SAND CREEK 5868145 AMBUSH 5867820 ROSE ACRES 5867651 CREAM TATTOO 5867553 SUMMER PROJECT 5867462 PASTURE BOOSTER PRIME 5867343 THERMO CUBE 5867225 MAGGIE’S MEMORIES 5867133 INDIANA INTERSCHOLASTIC CYCLING LEAGUE 5867069 CRUISER CUSTOMIZING 5867005 ASTRO ARMOUR 5866945 MANAGED SOCIAL 5866889 K12BOOST 5866888 EQUITABLE EDUCATION SOLUTIONS 5866825 GNARLYHORN 5866757 S SHARPER 5866744 VICTORY CRUISE LINES 5866531 GCI STRONGER BY DESIGN 5866365 JESS… [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 9:16 am
Teva Pharma USA, Inc. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 6:21 am
David Savage of the Los Angeles Times, Bill Mears of CNN, Bob Barnes of the Washington Post, Bob Egelko of the San Francisco Chronicle, Joan Biskupic of USA Today, and Mark Sherman of the Associated Press (via the Washington Post) all predict that a majority of the Court will uphold the court order requiring California to reduce its prison population by some 40,000 inmates. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:11 am
Staff picks are marked by asterisks. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
As discussed here, if considered satire, not parody, Dumb Starbucks could be liable for infringement (Dr Seuss Enterprises v Penguin Books USA (1997)).It seems unlikely that adding DUMB- provides enough distinction for it to avoid being considered an unauthorised derivative of Starbucks’ copyrighted works. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]
26 May 2018, 3:01 am
-- SAS Institute Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 2:45 pm
Joseph Sanders (University of Houston): Milward v. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 6:45 am
... [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
Cadbury Adams USA LLC (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) State Tort claim preempted by patent claim where pleading of bad faith did not meet Iqbal standards: Viskase Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994). [read post]
