Search for: "USA v. Sales"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,542
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 3:02 am
Also, see Contract Services Employee Trust v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 5:01 am
"] In Decastro v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 7:00 am
Similarly, Chamber of Commerce of the USA v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 10:36 am
Double Diamond Distribution Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 3:00 pm
” See Tanzer v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 10:50 am
Co. v. [read post]
Celanese v. ITC: Can a Secret Manufacturing Process Be Patented After Sale of the Resulting Product?
4 Mar 2024, 9:45 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. held that in the AIA, Congress did not change the meaning of “on sale” from the pre-AIA statute. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 1:29 pm
She cites ElliottEstate v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Rolex Watch USA, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:00 pm
KRISTINA PASCARELLA AND ANNA D’ ANTONIO, Petitioner,v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 6:31 am
As for the injunction, the Fifth Circuit agreed with Rolex that the district court should have enjoined the sale of Rolex watches with non-genuine bezels, thus affirming, as modified, the district court’s injunction in part (Rolex Watch USA, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:42 am
Thales DIS AIS USA LLC, 39 F.4th 1377 (Fed. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
Gibbons P.C. congratulates Damian V. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
Gibbons P.C. congratulates Damian V. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
Gibbons P.C. congratulates Damian V. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 9:16 am
Lundbeck A/S, et al. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name, was… [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
The court, in affirming a district court’s grant of a preliminary injunction freezing sales of the parody shoe, also found that the district court acted within its discretion in weighing the traditional likelihood of confusion factors (Vans, Inc. v. [read post]
