Search for: "USA v. Seizure Warrant" Results 21 - 40 of 73
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2007, 9:59 am
("Title III"), we AFFIRM the district court's orders. 07a0089p.06 2007/03/02 USA v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 5:09 am by Federal and Extradition Defense
A related US case is that of USA v Emmanuel, (11th Cir. 2009), in which the Court affirmed a denial of suppression of Bahama wiretap evidence. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:08 am by Ben
Visitors to the domain arwew now confronted by a notice which states that the FBI has taken control of the site 'pursuant to a seizure warrant issued by a United States District Court'. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am by rainey Reitman
Chatrie (Ongoing case re geofence warrants) US v Chatrie – Government Opposition to Motion to Suppress (Geofence Warrant) (EFF’s amicus brief) US v Chatrie – Google Amicus Brief (Geofence Warrant) (Google’s amicus brief)  US v Chatrie – Google Declaration (Geofence Warrant) (Google’s declaration) Do Geofence Warrants Violate the Fourth Amendment? [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 7:04 am
The case was Philip Morris USA, et al., v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am by Rick St. Hilaire
The warrant authorized the seizure of  "looted and/or stolen antiquities appearing to originate from Syria and/or Turkey, including mosaics and records related to antiquities. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:18 am by SHG
Burger, 482 US. 69] (1987), temporary baggage seizures, United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 4:33 pm by Aaron Mackey
The court ordered the government to submit information, and also took the opportunity to appoint amici to counter the otherwise one-sided arguments by the government, a procedure given to the court as part of the 2015 USA Freedom Act (and which EFF had strongly advocated for). [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 1:43 am
FinesmithCRIMINAL PRACTICE - Warrants"A two-week restriction of a communications data warrant was unnecessarily restrictive of the state's right of investigation. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 6:21 pm by Mike
Ryan in the amount of $124,102.50 USA v. $57,890 is a forfeiture action. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 10:03 am by Benjamin Wittes
Considering the massive debate in USA on the matter it may be worth comparing the laws on signals intelligence and metadata collection in Europe and the USA. [read post]