Search for: "Ubiquiti Networks, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2021, 3:40 am
In re Snap Inc., Serial Nos. 87177292 and 87211997 (November 3, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
15 May 2012, 12:41 pm by Joseph Tomain
Fox Television Stations, Inc. nears, a brief history of indecency regulation may be of interest and begins with a tie to music. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 8:02 am
"MySQL's employees and culture, along with its near ubiquity across the Web, make it an ideal fit with Sun's open approach to network innovation. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 11:02 am by Rohit Dave
The TRENDnet, Inc. example serves as both validation of the FTC’s concerns about the IoT and as a potential prototype for how the FTC may handle future enforcement actions within the IoT context. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 7:22 am by Matthias Weller
– provisional measure”, decided in favor of Google Inc. in a case concerning fake news. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 6:59 am by Kristian Soltes
These efforts include TCH’s efforts to connect financial institutions’ (FIs’) core banking systems to the company’s Real-Time Payments (RTP) network, along with what card networks and FinTechs are doing to enable real-time push payments to receiver bank accounts. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 9:23 am by Kristian Soltes
Facebook Inc. has announced plans to launch a cryptocurrency-based payments system on the back of its social network, while Chinese giants Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and Tencent Holdings Ltd. have developed digital payments systems that dominate in that country. . . . [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 3:01 am by tekEditor
Network cloud 60 generally represents one or more interconnected networks, over which the systems and [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:17 am by Eric Goldman
YouTube (9th Cir. 2020) ruling reinforces this: “Despite YouTube’s ubiquity and its role as a public-facing platform, it remains a private forum, not a public forum subject to judicial scrutiny under the First Amendment… YouTube does not perform a public function by inviting public discourse on its property” Regarding YouTube providing a public function: “the relevant function ‘must be both traditionally and exclusively governmental. [read post]