Search for: "Ude v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2023, 10:46 am
Ud Din v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 1:10 am
Allina Health System v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:03 am
While of course the courts have superior authority to the tribunals, they have also recognised the specialist expertise of such tribunals in the past.Hogan J. also does not refer to Dubyna v Hourican Hygiene (2005) UD 781/2004, another EAT case in which it was found that a contract in breach of the Employment Permits Act 2003 was enforceable where the employee was unaware of the breach. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
Matter of New York City Dept. of Social Sevs. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 4:39 am
” In Midwestern Audit Services, Inc., v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 4:16 am
While of course the courts have superior authority to the tribunals, they have also recognised the specialist expertise of such tribunals in the past.Hogan J. also does not refer to Dubyna v Hourican Hygiene (2005) UD 781/2004, another EAT case in which it was found that a contract in breach of the Employment Permits Act 2003 was enforceable where the employee was unaware of the breach. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 1:23 pm
Ude, Jr. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 1:00 am
The latter provision states that jurisdiction over parental responsibility issues should be transferred to the courts where the child has acquired a new habitual residence and one of the alternative conditions set out in the said provision is satisfied (SS v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:08 am
In Sharif-Ud-Din Vs. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
By administrative order of the Chief Administrative Judge of the Courts the Unified Court System Uncontested Divorce Packet Instructions and Judgment of Divorce (Form UD-11) for use in undefended matrimonial actions pursuant to 22 NYCRR §§ 202.21(i) and 202.50, were repealed and new versions of that form and instructions were enacted as follows: Instructions (rev. 9/30/18); Judgment of Divorce (Form UD-11)… [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
By administrative order of the Chief Administrative Judge of the Courts the Unified Court System Uncontested Divorce Packet Instructions and Judgment of Divorce (Form UD-11) for use in undefended matrimonial actions pursuant to 22 NYCRR §§ 202.21(i) and 202.50, were repealed and new versions of that form and instructions were enacted as follows: Instructions (rev. 9/30/18); Judgment of Divorce (Form UD-11)… [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 1:06 pm
Robert Loeb and Sarah Grant argued that the decision of the Eastern District of Virginia in Al Shimari, et. al. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:12 am
” Then, a case called Kreiner v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 7:00 am
Prior to the ruling, federal courts were able to prosecute individuals as young as 15 for material support, but in the wake of the Sessions v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 7:43 am
It held that contrary to Matter of Barbara T. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 12:42 pm
Barcelona’s Argentinian forward Lionel Messi (R) leaves the field after being injured during the Spanish league football match FC Barcelona v UD Las Palmas at the Camp Nou stadium in Barcelona on September 26, 2015. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 2:01 pm
Patel v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 5:40 am
In State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 7:16 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: District Court W D Washington re-affirms that first sale doctrine can apply to “licensed” software: Vernor v Autodesk (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Technology & Marketing) (Ars Technica) (Spicy IP) Australian ISP in court for not disconnecting users: AFACT v iiNet (Ars Technica) (TorrentFreak)… [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 12:09 am
In the case G v. [read post]
