Search for: "Udell v. Page"
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2011, 8:30 am
Our great thanks to David Udell and to Bob Sable for taking the time to comment (separately) on our paper, “What Difference Representation? [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
" Although the Board had contend that the statements at issue "are reasonably susceptible of defamatory connotations," the Appellate Division opined that the Board's complaint failed to "make a rigorous showing that the language of the [article] as a whole can be reasonably read both to impart a defamatory inference and to affirmatively suggest that the [Defendants] intended or endorsed that inference," citing Udell v NYP Holdings, Inc., 169 AD3d at… [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
" Although the Board had contend that the statements at issue "are reasonably susceptible of defamatory connotations," the Appellate Division opined that the Board's complaint failed to "make a rigorous showing that the language of the [article] as a whole can be reasonably read both to impart a defamatory inference and to affirmatively suggest that the [Defendants] intended or endorsed that inference," citing Udell v NYP Holdings, Inc., 169 AD3d at… [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 1:02 pm
More Information and Resources DLI has a page of information and links to resources dedicated to answering questions about COVID-19 and workers’ compensation. [read post]