Search for: "Ultra Products, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 244
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2023, 9:43 am by Dennis Crouch
However, injunctive relief has become much rarer following the after the landmark case of eBay Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 10:14 pm by D. Daxton White
  Leveraged inverse ETFs (also known as “ultra short” funds) seek to achieve a return that is a multiple of the inverse performance of the underlying index. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:25 pm by Howard Knopf
SODRAC 2003 Inc., 2015 SCC 57 (CanLII), [2015] 3 SCR 615, <https://canlii.ca/t/gm8b0> namely that: [113] I find that licences fixed by the Board do not have mandatory binding force over a user; the Board has the statutory authority to fix the terms of licences pursuant to s. 70.2, but a user retains the ability to decide whether to become a licensee and operate pursuant to that licence, or to decline. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 2:02 pm by Scharon Harding
The complaint points to the first Chromecast and the second and third generations, Chromecast Ultra and Chromecast with Google TV, as well as other Chromecast-integrated products, as infringements of Touchstream patents.Read 13 remaining paragraphs | Comments [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:46 am
Goods in Trade: Precedential No. 11: TTAB Reverses Six "Goods In Trade" Refusals for NY Times Non-Syndicated Column Titles Ownership: Precedential No. 13: TTAB Allows Cancellation Respondent to Correct Registration Ownership Specimen of Use/Nonuse/Illegal Use: Precedential No. 15: Finding Essential Oil Dispensers to be Illegal Drug Paraphernalia, TTAB Affirms Refusal of Two Proposed Marks TTAB Grants Cancellation for Nonuse: ULTRA SUN Sunscreen Was Offered For Sale But Not… [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 4:21 am
Once it was established that Respondent had not used its ULTRA SUN mark in commerce by the Critical Date, all of its activities directed to the ULTRA SUN mark and product(s) after that date were of no consequence. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
Selikoff diverted regulatory attention from asbestos fiber type, with the result that the OSHA PELs were lowered for both chrysotile and amphibole asbestos, thus leaving the ultra-hazardous crocidolite asbestos in use. [read post]