Search for: "Unger v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 117
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2013, 5:53 am
Our next post will discuss case management considerations. [1] See, e.g., Unger v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:53 am
Our next post will discuss case management considerations. [1] See, e.g., Unger v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:59 pm
Unger, 28 Ohio St.3d 418, 421 (1986) (while most public-access cases discuss the right to access "trials," "we hold that the right to a public trial pursuant to the United States and Ohio Constitutions extends to pretrial proceedings. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:44 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March… [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 2:17 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 03/03/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 R (on the application of VIP… [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 1:59 am
R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4th October 2022 McCue v Glasgow City Council, heard 18th October 2022 Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (deceased) and another, heard 20th October 2022 In the matter of an application by Rosaleen Dalton for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 26th October 2022. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 3:08 am
Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland – Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Northern Ireland) Bill, heard 19th July 2022 R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4th October 2022 of DCM (Optical Holdings) v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 12th October 2022 McCue v Glasgow City Council, heard 18th October… [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 4:56 am
In Unger v Leviton (5 Misc 3d 925 [Sup Ct, Nassau County 2004], affd 25 AD3d 689 [2d Dept 2006]), retired Justice F. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 1:57 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 24/02/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 R (on the application of VIP… [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 7:19 pm
” Unger v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:57 pm
Dist. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
Unger (1986), 28 Ohio St. 3d 418, 421 (both pre-trial and trial proceedings are open to the public); Sup.R. 45(A) (case documents are open to the public). [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 8:29 am
Tuesday also marked the end of the line for Unger v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:31 am
” Unger v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:52 pm
Unger v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 7:17 am
The Ninth Circuit admitted that its decision conflicted with the Fifth Circuit’s decision in Unger v. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 5:29 pm
While the Court of Appeal in John v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:32 pm
Unfortunately, the majority’s broad view of 1182(f)’s delegation missed its more tailored role in the INA’s overall plan (see the amicus brief for immigration scholars on which I served as co-counsel with Shoba Wadhia of Penn State and WilmerHale’s Alan Schoenfeld, Ben Gifford and Francisco Unger). [read post]
14 May 2008, 3:40 am
Litig.), 471 F.3d 24, 33, 41 (2d Cir.2006) [hereinafter In re IPO ] (requiring a "definitive assessment of Rule 23 requirements," including the resolution of relevant factual disputes); Unger v. [read post]
