Search for: "Union Bank v. County of Los Angeles" Results 1 - 20 of 37
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2011, 9:46 am
Wells Fargo, Case# 09-00860, February 26, 2009 (Los Angeles County Superior Court, California), • Masterton v. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 9:28 am by Nassiri Law
Contact the employment attorneys at Nassiri Law Group, practicing in Orange County, Riverside and Los Angeles. [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:05 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Self-insured employer or union sponsored health plans (Plans), their fiduciaries, third party administrative or other service providers, and sponsors should consult legal counsel for advice about whether their Plans might violate the Privacy Rule of the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act (HIPAA) by disclosing individually identifiable claims or other Plan records or data to a state “all payer” claims or other data base in response to a state law or regulation… [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which the court will consider whether public-sector unions may require non-members to help pay for collective bargaining, noting that the case has “enormous financial implications for teachers’ unions. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the county and its officials. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 8:59 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Digests of WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:02 pm by Tomassi Law Associates
It owns the Chicago Tribune, Los Angeles Times, six other newspapers and 23 television stations. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 6:11 am by Jim Sedor
California – Sky’s the New Spending Limit in LA’s Westside Supervisor’s Race KPCC – Sharon McNary | Published: 3/12/2014 Bobby Shriver, who is running for a seat on the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors in the June 3 primary, has rejected voluntary campaign spending limits and said he will at least partially self-fund his race. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]